|
Greenfield
Recorder 09/10/2011, Page A01 |
|
Where
are we now? Gauging
national conscience 10 years after terrorist attacks
A decade later, it’s back to Ground Zero.
As the dust has settled from
the tragedy of that Tuesday morning, what has taken hold is a culture that
many see as fearful and a society that’s moved away from guarding its civil
liberties toward protecting itself from a nebulous enemy, say several area observers. The
Rev. Kate Stevens, pastor of First Congregational Church of Ashfield, agreed, and pointed to the recent flooding and
the threat of this summer’s tornado as ways in which people feel more
vulnerable today — much of which she believes was triggered by the 2001
attacks and the Bush administration’s response to them. |
|
|
the
media and in politics.
“It’s fear, but really it’s prejudice and
it’s racism and fearing ‘the other’ that made a lot of people in the country
feel they have to stick together, that it’s us against them, whoever the ‘us’
is.”
‘Outpouring
of emotion’
Because the attacks fell in the gray zone between an organized
criminal act and a military exercise by a declared enemy state, the response
can be viewed — and has been
viewed in different
ways.
Linda Tropp, director of the
Psychology of Peace and Violence Program at UMass, said, “There was a moment
where many people in the U.S. and around the world felt an incredible
outpouring of emotion about what happened and were on the side of the United
States, saying, ‘We’re so sorry for your loss.’ Instead of capitalizing on that
and investigating in a meaningful way the question, ‘Why do they hate us so
much?’, we as a nation instead sought to reassert our
dominance as a world power.”
As a result, she said, “We‘ve become
so focused on reaffirming our world view, and debating about who’s really an
American,” that we’ve tended to glorify our country, “and not question or look
critically at our own decisions or actions. In terms of curbing future
conflict, that’s problematic.”
Desensitization
“What
really frustrates me is the political maneuvering and nobody focuses on how to
stop things without alarming everybody,” said Greenfield Police Chief David Guilbault. “There was that little colorcode
event thing. We never knew what that meant, and after a while, nobody paid
attention to that. There was no coordinated thought behind that.”
Guilbault said that personally, he’s frustrated by how
desensitized people become.
“We reset ourselves so mu ch,” he said. “When something bad happens, everybody’s all
amped up about it and scared, and they say how come we didn’t catch
that.
But then we get back to normal and we have to take our shoes
off and have to get padded down. If you have to ensure my safety by checking me
at an airport, I don’t take issue with that.”
Guilbault
sees the Sept. 11 attacks as “criminalistic behavior.
People are going to do that one way or the other no matter what stand we take
with them, so you have to prepare yourself for the criminal element one way or
the other … It’s pretty safe in New York City because a very concentrated
effort has been made and they’ve put a lot of effort into that, but like any
kind of criminal behavior, they evolve. Once the targets are hardened there,
they’re going to find somewhere else to do what their thing is. So you have to
constantly react and adapt. There’s some kind of tradeoff, but people need to
be aware.”
We also need to think
more broadly, said UMass Sociology Professor Emeritus N. Jay Demerath III.
“I think Americans have a very
difficult time understanding how anybody could dislike this country,” he said.
“They see us always in the right, even when we’re manifestly in the
wrong, and they have a hard time putting themselves in the shoes of others
elsewhere, and that’s too bad, because that’s the world we’re now living
in.”
Demerath added, “Instead of
reaching for answers of a sophisticated sort, answers that would require a
deepening of our knowledge, understanding and appreciation of what was going on
in other countries to trigger this thing, we tended to recoil in a kind of
patriotic response that was largely military and has gone on 10 years. And the
remarkable thing is it HAS been 10 years, and we haven’t really come to terms
with the situation successfully.”
‘Psychological
damage’
Ted Thornton, a Northfield Mount Hermon School history and social
sciences teacher who has taught a course about the Mideast for 34 years, said,
“What explains a lot of the psychological damage is that this was the worst
attack on the domestic United States since the War of 1812, when Great Britain
burned Washington, D.C. Pearl Harbor did provoke a tremendous response, but …
here was New York City, the iconic center of American culture and it was
attacked. I think we continue to underestimate the psychological damage from that
… We’re still very much living in the psychological dust storm created on that
terrible day. Much more time has to go by before we’ll completely
heal.”
Thornton said he’s been encouraged by the “counterjihad” that’s now taking place in the Mideast, “initiated
largely by secularized, young Arabs.” He’s also heartened by the growing
interest in learning about the Mideast and Islam — enough so that for the first
time this year, NMH had to offer two sections of its course on the
Mideast.
Yet Stewart ‘Buz’ Eisenberg, a
civil liberties lawyer who teaches criminal justice at GCC and has represented
seven men detained at Guantanamo, is concerned about the long-term impact on
civil liberties in this country.
“From my perspective, the damage
to civil liberties has been terrible over the last decade. That we’ve eroded
some of the Constitutional principles we use to define our freedoms is a
concern of mine. Throughout our history, our Constitution has suffered its
greatest body blows in times of fear … Until we confront our fears with a
commitment to preserving our real freedom, we’ll keep
bleeding as a result of 9/11. We should not be surveilling
our citizens, we should not be punching holes in the notion of probable cause.”
Working together
When
the attacks on the World Trade Center took place, Susan Marenec,
now executive director of Montague Catholic Social Ministries, was living three
to four blocks away on Murray Street. She learned about it at work far uptown
when someone entered the drawing class she was teaching to look out the window,
across Central Park to see if they could see any sign of what was happening. It
took a month before Marenec, escorted, could return
home, and she moved in 2009 to Leverett — where she’d
had a house dating back more than 35 years.
“It changed our lives
forever,” she said — although much more so for people living close
by.
As a result of the pulling together by neighbors in lower
Manhattan in the weeks and months after 9/11, she said, a community resilience
grew that she believes may have had a deeper impact in how many non-profits
work.
“People came together, and all the authorities were
sequestered awa y,” she said. “A volunteer network
developed and continued. And I think that continues to be a force in people’s
lives. People found they could work together as equals without a lot of
authority and direction, and that’s a kind of interesting energy that may be
playing itself out. Now a lot of people are talking
about ways in which, in the current economic and social environment, we need to
think about new forms of leadership.”
“The power of people after
9/11 to bring people in this country together is maybe what I’d like to
remember about it. It really was across class, across race, across political
ideology, across religion.” Maranec said. “That’s
what I’d like to think of as a legacy: we have a recent reminder of the fact
that we can help each other and be better for that and have hope in that, in
this day of so little hope.”
You can reach Richie Davis at: rdavis@recorder.c om or 413-772-0261 Ext. 269